Embrace LEED (if your local government hasn’t already)
Green costs are decreasing slowly [they'd be decreasing more quickly if we had a stronger commitment to granting incentives to alt energy manufacturing companies]. I’ve seen shrinking figures on additional cost percentages [down to a 1.5% to 3.1% range from a 3% average over the past two years] and mostly a static time period for recouping that additional expense due to steadily [but slightly] rising standard energy costs [carbon-based]. Savings will obviously increase if there is sharper upward movement of traditional energy costs [which is what is being predicted based on the market]. Richmond committed to LEED Silver for all new construction and renovation of over 5,000 square feet, something that will benefit the newly-approved new Huguenot High School. Voting against this type of technology in construction is foolish on numerous accounts. First, if we oppose this greening of our buildings, we’d be short-changing ourselves left and right based on passing up savings that reach ten times or more the amount of the original capital investment. Second, we’d obviously be short-changing the environment when statistics are showing a greater propensity of children to develop asthma due to standard airborne pollutants. Third, we’d be shortchanging the engineering/construction/architecture community that could otherwise be pursuing certification to draw upon a greater clientele base. Based on finance power for local governments, the minute investment would cut energy spending and free up revenue that could be used to better other areas of services and also offer an opportunity for pesky things like urban real estate taxes to be subsided. There are a lot of options and opportunities. Do us a favor. Go green.




